Analysis of Comments on a New York Times Article Essay

The article, â€Å"Forced From Executive Pay to Hourly Wage,† which was composed by Michael Luo and was distributed in the New York Times last February 28, 2009, essentially recounted to the narrative of individuals who used to gain five or six-figure sums every year, are presently being paid hourly least wages. One model in the article was the situation of Mark Cooper, who used to procure $70,000 as a security director for Fortune 500 Company in the United States and who supervises a spending plan of $1. 2 million. Nine months prior, he lost his activity and now he is winning $12 an hour in his position at his friend’s janitorial administrations organization. In spite of the fact that the article itself is sufficiently engaging, it is likewise fascinating to take note of the readers’ remarks about it. Starting at now, there are 300 remarks about the article and after looking into the vast majority of them, it tends to be construed that every peruser who remarked had fundamentally various perspectives and sentiments about the story told in the New York Times article. Clearly, these perusers stick to various good codes which are seen through their reactions. All in all, the perusers who remarked on the article can be partitioned into two gatherings: one gathering praised the daring demonstration of Mark Cooper while the other scrutinized the style of composing and the unobtrusive message that New York Times essayist utilized in the article. One of the reader’s who lauded the article story appreciated the mental fortitude of Mr. Cooper as he had the option to bring down his pride and discovered approaches to accommodate his family regardless of whether it implies that he needs to clean toilets and have his pay drastically decreased from five figures to a time-based compensation with no advantages. It could be said, this gathering exceptionally respected the estimation of difficult work and starting from the very beginning again in a noble manner. The greater part of their remarks fundamentally demonstrated that Mr. Cooper isn't the only one and that there are several Americans who have comparative â€Å"riches to rags† stories. These perusers, in view of their remarks, additionally accepted that there is no disgrace being poor up to one has a noble and legal activity. On other hand, the other gathering of perusers who remarked on the article reprimanded the New York Times for suggesting that the individuals who work manual occupations are lower types of people than the individuals who work professional ones. They consider the to be as segregating to Americans who have been experiencing their lives beneath the neediness line for quite a while even before the current financial emergency. For instance, one peruser deplored that article pretty much indicated that a $12-an-hour work is a profane method of living, which isn't correct. Furthermore, one peruser didn't feel frustrated about Mr. Cooper and remarked that he had a great deal to be grateful for in light of the fact that he lives in a better than expected house and had the option to carry on with a rich life. To this peruser, the monetary emergency makes everybody in America equivalent since they are battling to make a decent living. Nonetheless, what’s regular in all the readers’ reactions is that they could all identify with the troubles experienced by the individuals portrayed in the article. Actually a portion of the perusers, who are obviously from various different backgrounds, shared their own accounts in their remarks. At the end of the day, the single factor that ties all the perusers who remarked is the hardship achieved by the money related emergency in America. As it were, the article’s remarks show two things: one is that there are a great deal of Americans who are so used to a decent life that they are apparently found napping when a staggering money related emergency like this hits them and the other is that because of the emergency, most Americans would take on any activity just to endure. Yet, the remarks additionally showed that Americans are increasingly brought together in accomplishing a shared objective which is to recuperate from the staggering impacts of the emergency and remake their lives. Works Cited Luo, Mark. â€Å"Forced From Executive Pay to Hourly Wage. † 28 February 2009. New York Times. 4 March 2009 < http://www. nytimes. com/2009/03/01/us/01survival. html? pagewanted=1&_r=2&sq=executive%20janitor&st=cse&scp=1>.