Interaction between Police, Prosecutors, and the Courts Research Paper

Interaction between Police, Prosecutors, and the Courts - Research Paper ExampleThe smooth and intumesce orchestrated interaction between law of nature, prosecutors, and the courts is necessary to keep the peace and economic viability of the community. The police officers keep the criminals and more or lessbodys below trial in toss away while they are processed for trial. When convicted by the courts of law, the police officers will jail the convicted person in jail the serve the jail sentence handed down by the courts of law. The prosecutors give way evidences to the courts to prove the guilt of the persons charged. The courts determine whether the person charged is guilty or exculpated of the iniquity charged. The police officers must(prenominal) ensure that they will implement a high quality investigation to feret out the criminals from the innocent persons as the officers roam the streets of the United States community. The police officers should take extra care of the e vidences gathered in auberge to ensure that the courts verdict will be correct. The police officers presentation of falsified evidences may leave behind to the courts err unityous verdict. The erroneous verdict may be to convict an innocent person because of circumstantial evidence. A nonher erroneous verdict is to declare innocence a person of a crime due to some judicial technicalities. One such legal technically is the police officers gathering of evidences by using force on a person, against the persons will. ... The prosecutor must ensure that the court will receive gaffe evidences as a basis for issuing a guilty verdict as well as issue court ruling using legal doctrines. For example, the prosecutor must use the proper section or law references to back up ones thesis. The court is challenged to prioritize cases. For example, the court must prioritize cases where the person accused is being held beneath lock and key by the police officers. The court must ensure that the po lice officers and the prosecutors do not violate the basic rights of the accused persons during their incarceration. For example, Samuel Walker (1993) emphasized The videotaped beating of Rodney King by Los Angeles police officers on March 3, 1991--an event that electrified the countrydramatized the problem of police discretion. The officers involved acted out their worst impulses, obviously believe they would never be caught or punished. The fact that a sergeant was present and that the officers later discussed the incident everywhere the police radio is the most damning evidence of their sense of immunity. The above Rodney King case shows an extreme of the American justice system. The police officers took the law into their own hands. They manhandled the victim, Rodney King of Los Angeles, California. Consequently, the prosecutors must put into accomplishment its duty to gather enough evidences to prosecute the abusive Los Angeles police officers. The police officers must do the ir surmount to reduce the crime rate in the community. In their frustration over the unabated crime incidents, some police officers may be triggered to act irrationally. The police officers must uphold the rights of the accused. One of the