KTSP: Teaching English As A Foreign Language

KTSP article of faith slope As A Foreign LanguageIn the rush of history since 1945 (Independence Year), the case semipolitical program of Ind nonp beilsia had undergone kindd into several(prenominal) times, to wit in 1947, 1952, 1964, 1968, 1975, 1984, 1994, 2004 and the modish course of KTSP 2006 (best understood as indoctrinate Based Currriculum), those amendments argon logic tot eitheryy consequences of political issue, government system, social cultural, economic, science and technology changes in the animation of state comm social wholey (Soekisno, 2007, para. 1). therefore, the program as a spate of pedagogyal intents should be riseed dynamically in concord with the demands and changes that occur in society. All In through with(p)sias national political platforms were designed base on the same groundation, namely Pancasila (Philosophical foundation of the Indonesian nation) and the 1945 constitution, the principal differences among those political progr ams were only on emphasizing of educational goals and approaches to in truthize it.Continuing to improve the quality of education in assemble commensurate with others break throughgrowth countries, Indonesian government has made several(a) changes, and hold outs to limited review the execution of instrument of education in Indonesia. As kn possess, the study grooming touchstones of Indonesia (BSNP) had correct with presidential consideration economy (PP) No. 19 Year 2005 format eight contents of the Standards of culture, specifically field of workplace Standard, Standard wait on, Graduates Competency Standards, Educators Standards and instruction Workforce, Infrastructure Standards , Management Standards, Financial Standards and Evaluation Standards. at the same time by that political relation Regulation No.19 year 2005 affected to the direction of Indonesian course discip business concern policies to carry through its Content Standard (SK) and Graduate Competency Standard (SKL) where thus beingness established through the Regulation of The diplomatic minister of National Education Number 22, 23, 24 year 2006. These trinity regulations then further expand to be KTSP (School Based course of study) which is built and go againsted by to each one educational whole or prep be in Indonesia.According to Azumardi Azra (2006) explained that the changes in education in Indonesia meat that there argon two current paradigms emerged in education, cuttinging the orientation of the policy where previously being reduced to decentralized, then national education is more oriented to the learning process quite than results. Decentralized system means to implement the recent breakthrough of School-Based platform where frequently kn aver as KTSP in Indonesia.KTSP which is then translated to be School-Based curriculum (SBC), this kind of curriculum replaced its predecessor of Competence Based syllabus (KBK) 2004. Mulyasa (2008) viewed almost in both turn of the Ministry of Education give probably changes the curriculum.Its change of curriculum had implicated and affected the national education system of Indonesia it had non only affected the learning climate in the classroom, as sanitary as the readiness of the principal and subject instructors in effort to get wind and ease up the arrange. In addition, Sutrisno Nuryanto (2008) viewed that the slaying has non optimally practice as a sequence of educational perpetrators who think KTSP differ with KBK. Mean enchantment Suhadi (2006) argued in such of that assumption due to a priory attitudes and psychological resistance against the changes. Whereas the changes enhancing the running(a) practice of curriculum which are developed and implemented by each make fors consisting of their own respective goals, topical anesthetic content perspectives, educational calendar and syllabus.KTSP which was being mandated by Ministry of National Education Ind onesia (MoNE) through The National Education Standard Institution (BSNP) means to reinforce the execution of instrument of its predecessor (read KBK), it implies that KTSP still arrange pressure on ontogenesis students competencies, gibe to Fasli Bachruddin (2007) said that KTSP carrying into action leave non be undergoing through a public test, beca example this curriculum has been tested through KBK which was being applied by several schools in a pilot project before the born of KTSP. This is then a avocation-up toward curriculum change in the circumstance of regional autonomy and decentralization of education programmed by the government of Indonesia. The implementation of this curriculum is cogitate on three dimensions of students enrichment of be intimateledge (cognitive), attitude formation (affective) and behavior (psychomotor).On KTSP the school and teacher wee-wee an authority to decide the educational goals found on their own schools perspective, in other word s, teacher have duties on (1) construct and produce the proper goal, (2) choose and construct the reclaim lesson material according to the motivatings, by-line and children organic evolution phase, (3) using various methods and teaching media, (4) and construct the program and the right rating. A curriculum should be made systematically and detail, which will liberalisation the teacher on its implementation.However, KTSP faces major challenges related to contain of local information, national, and international. feature these integrations may only be solved by having resources which are lively ahead of time, not by the teachers who prepared instantly through a compartmentalisation of curriculum development serve wellance programs. More dangerous if the schools finally just offered cheat or trace the guidelines were offered by National Education Standard (BSNP). If so, SBC will create the instant schools, stunted creativity while its very contrary to the mandate of the K TSP.Some of the reasons behind the needs for this seek include (1) KTSP implementation needs to be evaluated simultaneously through qualitatively and quantitatively, and (2) the results of that valuation locoweed be made as the basic information for all policy decisions relate to educational elements in Riau Province particularly at Indragiri Hilir Regency. look ProblemHowever, having launched on 2006, there were many a(prenominal) issues discussed by talenteds and parties whose responsible for education, particularly in the implementation of School Based Curriculum (KTSP) which has inadequate humane resources whose capable to interpret yet elaborate it into the practice of educational unit , incompleteness of the accompaniment facilities of its implementation, the teachers do not consider KTSP as a whole, both in terminals of concept and its implementation in schools and even still busy using the previous possibility in the process of teaching and learning in classroom. In accordance with the principal of KTSP, all directs and types of education in Indonesia must develop their own curriculum base on their potential drop areas and students. This is supported by Minister of National Education Regulation No. 22 of 2006 on the Content Standards, as well as Minister of National Education Regulation No. 23 of 2006 on Graduates Competency Standards (SKL), these regulations mandate to the schools in come in being required to prepare their own curriculum. However, this policy is not tended to(p) by teachers readiness even sense, these generate the confusion among them while applying the KTSP.As informed by Curriculum center 2010, the monitoring noticed intimately the implementation of KTSP has been conducted loosely in large areas, although majority of them still adopting from brisk sit of curriculum. Hopefully, with skillful cares that under realizen by various parties affect to the victory of its development and helping their understanding o n the concept and philosophy, and then encourage them to develop based on their respective schools.There are ever so the various obstacles occurred during realizing the em causalityment of schools and its KTSP, at the first, pretermit of business leader is the main construct, by creating the development of staffs capabilities while providing technical assistance to particular regions could lead them to learn by doing. The instability of funding for the dispersion and socialization of KTSP causes Curriculum Center too experienced substantial cost-cutting measures, it impacts the unadulterated planning that has been initially organized became firmly hampered in its implementation and as well make the distrusting between local to Curriculum Center. But the best personality of area in welcoming this new curriculum to be mellowly efficacious drug for the Curriculum Center to do the best in accordance with the appropriate quality needs, potentials and regional particularities.T he Implementation of a new curriculum would potentially fail if it was be imprudent to consider the strength of human resources. As stated by Francis Hunkins (2004) argued that one reason may miscarry a new curriculum is that implementation has not been considered critical in curriculum development, further assert that frequently new and innovative programs are franked at classroom doors (p. 298). So, a new curriculum that is scientifically well may not necessarily be implemented or will be blunt its scientific in the classroom practice.Therefore, any problems arise due to the implementation of KTSP supposed to comprise more serious concern of Indonesian Government, curiously Indonesian Ministry of National Education. Things that must be considered such as the followingImproving teachers quality and understanding toward relevant concepts of KTSP implementation.Providing such of facilities and infrastructure that can support the successful of KTSP implementation.Simultaneously help every educational unit in developing KTSP.Evaluating its process at provincial level to local district and regions.Whatever the responses from the concerning person/social in think to the implementation of KTSP, school and teacher are the central to implement this school based curriculum, they themselves are potentially to overcome any weaknesses occur, if not it will be in vain.As suggested by Nana (2001) no matter on how honorable the curriculum is, but the results are highly dependent on what is being done by teachers and pupils in the classroom. It means the success of education through curriculum reformation will ultimately be find by teacher as an executor of the curriculum, and school as a learning provider.Research ObjectivesThis study aims to see how the implementation of School-Based Curriculum (Initialized as KTSP) in junior-grade High Schools and Senior High Schools as well as madrasah at Riau province Indonesia, specifically it will be conducted in one part of Riau Province namely Indragiri Hilir Regency. Particularly the objective of this study is to undertaking the status of KTSP implementation in dimensions of context, input, process and product.To figure out the end to which KTSP has been being implementing in High Schools and madrasaTo investigate the complexities of its implementation during 4 years runningTo find out the supporting facilities served by national and local government in its implementationOverall purpose of this study is to see the implementation of the KTSP in terms of context, input, process and product.Significance of the fillThe result of this study will obtain some of the practical benefits as followsThe policy recommendations to Indonesian Ministry of Education (especially for Indragiri Hilir Ministry of Education) based on the objectives data that will be resulted at the end of the study.Information to the public (stakeholder and parents)For basic development of relevant curriculum materials accordance with loc al potentials and teacher competency standard.As reference to the theoretical basis for the development of KTSP paradigm based on schools potential needs on respect to its planning, implementation, and paygrade.Research QuestionsIn overall objectives, this study will formulate the interrogation questions based on the evaluation model of curriculum developed by Stufflebeam (1972) those are linguistic context, Input, Process and Product. so the research questions are formulated as the followingDimension of ContextHow do the position teachers at Indragiri Hilir Regency develop their own curriculum based on schools desires, students needs and local needs?How do they implement and integrate all aspects of KTSP to their lesson plan and teaching?Dimension of InputHow the entire of KTSP credential (Lesson Plan, teachers, curriculum development material, supporting facilities, infrastructure and media) have been held completely in every Junior High School, Senior High Schools and Madra sah at Indragiri Hilir Regency Riau?How does the Indragiri Hilir Education Ministry assists the schools to develop their teachers capability in developing and implementing KTSP?Dimension of ProcessHow is the implementation of KTSP in Junior High School, Senior High Schools and Madrasah at Indragiri Hilir Regency Riau?How do they (Schools and teachers) evaluate its implementation?Dimension of ProductHow are the results of KTSP implementation?How the effect of KTSP implementation to students competence in slope (Impact of teachers creativities in designing their own curriculum development)CHAPTER IITHEORETICAL FRAMEWORK literature ReviewAs the latest curriculum on 2006 which is derived from KBK (CBC-Competence-Based Curriculum 2004), KTSP becomes a new breakthrough in the history of Indonesian education curriculum, which to gain ground its development to down-top approach. Contextually, KTSP develop by any groups or committees of the education unit or school/madrasah those under coo rdination and supervision of the National Indonesian Education Ministry and Local Indonesian Education Ministry. It emphasizes on developing the ability to execute competences and tasks with specific standards, so the results affect the students on mastery of a set of specific knowledge competencies, and values used in many fields of life. Indeed, KTSP is the curriculum that reflects the knowledge, skills and attitudes and similarly refers to the concept of education in bit to improve students potentiality optimally.Moreover, according to historical records, following the independence of the Republic of Indonesia, the Dutch lyric was replaced by English as the first unconnected language, and has been recognized as such in Indonesia since 1955 (Alisjabana, 1976 de Han, 2003 as cited in Mochtar Marhum, n.d.). Since the 1980s, English has been considered to be the most important external language in Indonesia. The governments and confederations reside in English has been growin g since the early 1990s (Alwasilah, 1997). This position of English can be traced from government documents on the results of Parliaments meetings. In the GBHN (The Guidelines of the State Policy) 1983 and 1988, unlike language policy was not incorporated. However, in the GBHN 1993, the policy on foreign languages, particularly English, was clearly stipulated. The policy related to the use and mastery of English. In 1988, Government Regulation No. 55, 56 and 57/1988 changing Government Regulation No. 28, 29/990 was introduced. It confirmed the use of English in schools. Moreover, Government Regulation of No 57/1957/1988 confirmed the use of English as a foreign language and as a means of communication in the university. Subsequently, it was incorporated into Government Regulation No 60/1999 on the use of English in all higher education. Alwasilah (1997) suggested that the need for mastery of English in the globalization era was absolutely necessary. In addition, it would be ideal i f the mastery of English became the mastery of second language (p. 89). Yet, the unique of this KTSP hopefully bring the new education model to the success of Indonesian education.The development of a KTSP is a new phenomenon for the school community in Indonesia, consequently, in the early show of its implementation some obstacles were found in a subprogram of schools. The freedom of schools to create their own curriculum which is relevant with the needs of students cannot be fully implemented (Harry Burhanudin, 2008). The general model of it which is being developed as a model and fully adopt by a number of schools has tended to cause a equal curriculum among schools as to what was being implemented in the centralistic era. The change in the role of schools from curriculum implementer to curriculum developer has made the school community confused. The capacitance of school community to analyze the conditions and needs of the students and implement them in school curriculum needs to be further improved. Therefore, school assistance through professional development programs provided for the head teachers and teachers in the context of this kind of school based curriculum is still considered important for several years to come. In line with the school assistance, capacity building of the educational negotiatement in autonomous regions (regency/municipality) managing the curriculum development still remains to be terminateA number of studies have been carried out to investigate its implementation, in a previous study conducted on 2008 where located in Jambi province of Indonesia revealed (Sutrisno Nuryanto, 2008) that KTSP to all levels (Elementary Schools, Junior and Senior High Schools) having less applicable in term of (a) KTSP developmental preparation, (b) syllabus development, (c) teachers self development, (d) integrated learning, (e) local content development, (f) outcomes assessment, and (g) floor process (p. 27).As such the issue above, impl ementation in this context leads to the true readiness of Jambi province in anticipating of changes toward educational paradigm from a previously centralized to decentralized. For example, KTSP which was launched on the late 2006 more emphasis on school autonomy through developing their own curriculum according to local needs and wisdoms, means Indonesian curricula is no longer centralized nationally and it is mandated on Indonesian Regulation No. 22 legislated in 1999 by the republic of Indonesia (R.I). Regarding local government, decentralization implies that the authority to implement and manage education shall be transferred from the national government to local districts or municipal government levels. At this point Sutrisno Nuryanto (1998) also asserted that the teachers rules as facilitator in KTSP elements have not been workings as the schools and committees expectations.Furthermore, on different burthen reported as the followingThe real condition shows that the paradigm shift is not necessarily accompanied by better result. A number of problems still advance in Jambi while on level of provinces, cities and countries. First, not all sectors which are directed to educational policy have human resources competent to formulate the technical policy and its implementation. Second, the increasingly of dominant political intervention in determining of policy and implementation, contextually in line with the trend of autonomy, bureaucratic chain is very closely possible to having dominantly power to education. (Sutrisno Nuryanto, 1998 p. 24).In a sense, it is important to consider the argument rose on where the KTSP developed, Endo viewed from this perspective that KTSP is similar to the concept of School-Based Curriculum Development (SBCD) in Australia which had begun to set on the mid-1970s, the discourse was in essence of giving more freedom in determining the curricula by the schools members (Endo, 1997). SBCD has several characteristics that are gener ally similar to SBC development in Indonesia, proved on through the liaison of teachers, participation of the whole or part of school staffs range of activities including selection (choice of a number of alternative curriculum), adaptation (modification of existing curriculum), and creation (designing a new curriculum) responsibilities transformation from centralist to decentralist (not terminating of responsibilities) and a continuation process among the community and stake-holders (to assist teachers and schools).Other studies have indicated, however, Indonesian KTSP is not derived from SBCD in Australia, such on this argument Wachyu (2009) argued KTSP is having the differentials factors from SBCD in Australia, KTSP is an integrated curriculum combining between the top-down and Bottom-Up approach that was being confirmed in USPN (Legislation of Indonesian National Education Standard) on chapter X, article 36 and 37, USPN revealed that Indonesian curriculum development is based on National Education Standard (SNP) and considerately carry attention on learners potential diversities, schools diversities and local needs. In Chapter 38 also states that the structure and framework of the curriculum of primary and secondary schools are determined by the government. Therefore, KTSP divided into core (subjects are tested nationally) and local subjects that are developed by each educational unit based on the assessment of its potential, including the content to develop learners personality and potential based on his interest in the form of extra-curricular activities.While SBCD in Australia tend to apply bottom-up approach, the entire process and the stages of curriculum based on the potential school. As confirmed by Skillbeck (1991) that School based curriculum is a process when some or all members of a school take part on planning, implementation, and evaluation on the aspects or elements of the curriculum (Sklill beck, 1991, as cited in Wachyu, 2009, p. 2).Decent ralized curriculum such of designing, implementing and controlling (evaluation and improvement) carried out through locally by each educational unit, teachers who design its curriculum working together with experts, schools committee/madrasah and others part of society. KTSP development could include all components of the curriculum or some only, instead of compilation can be done by a group or all teachers with regard to the needs of each school in accordance with the conditions in each educational unit or its surrounding communities. KTSP will be more meaningful because of the different situations in a certain local condition that lead to the fulfillment of needs, demands and local development. It will produce a variety of design but more easily to understand, mastered and implemented by teachers due to their involvement in expanding KTSP.Particularly the center of curriculum by Indonesian Education Ministry (2007) has pointed out also the advantages and its shortcomings, the adva ntages are taking on (1) KTSP is accordance with the needs, conditions, and on diversities which every local communities have, auto assist in developing society, (2) more easily to carry out due to the designs that have been prepared by teachers considering the local factors that really support to develop. Instead, it has also several shortcomings, (1) not all teachers have the expertise or skills in curriculum development then, not every local schools have the teachers or an expert that proficiently in developing such of it, (2) contently localized, the graduate can be lack of ability to participate the national competitiveness, (3) various designs that lead to the complexity of monitoring and evaluating in term of national learning outcomes, (4) transferring students from certain schools to some other schools can cause difficulties (Center for the Development of Curriculum, 2007).Recent reports have noted, researched by Wachyu Sundayana (2009), a number of 60 English teachers fr om junior and senior high schools dissipate of 24 regencies and cities in West chocolate Indonesia were being selected, most teachers who participated in this study had trained and socialized more or less KTSP. He organized the research questions on (1) How are English teachers understanding well-nigh KTSP, (2) How are their perceptions on the development of KTSP, (3) What complexities were raising during implementing and developing its curriculum. This study showed the development of KTSP in every unit of educations especially junior high schools and MTs (Madrasah) in West Java are still not in line with the stages of development as suggested in the guidelines of BSNP (Institution of National Education Standard).Data collection showed most teachers (74%) know what KTSP was, but they were not clear to what function they have in practice, implement and develop KTSP, for the same reason Faizah and Ismono studied for investigating the readiness of chemical science teachers (Bangkal an district of Madura), according to their finding that Chemistry teachers from five schools were not do to apply, the percentage just reached on 60% (Faizah Ismono, 2008, as cited in Yuli Eko Siswono, n.d).Simultaneously with the finding of Wachyu Sundayana study, the complexities on its implementation concluded as follows (1) lack of supporting facilities of the schools, (2) incompleteness of KTSP guidance that received by teachers, (3) KTSP guideline was not tiny and clear, (4) teachers understanding on KTSP documents. These data are consistent with the finding of research conducted by Miftahul Jannah (2008) showing about teachers abilities are low in developing syllabus and lesson plan, most of respondents (75%) stated about their inabilities in developing syllabus but just copying and duplicating the examples from BSNP without having a preliminary investigation passim students potentials and schools needs. Most of interviewing respondents admit to their complexities in maki ng a good syllabus and lesson plan lines with the students and schools needs. This fact showed that teachers having a great plague to develop among the stage on SBC (Miftahul Jannah, 2008, as cited in Wachyu Sundayana, 2009. p. 7).Regarding Riau province, whole schools on current educational year 2009/2010 are progressing to adapt KTSP, such socialization have always done, it felt as complexity because the entire process of being centralize to decentralize doesnt much understand by some teachers, referring to the function of teachers on KTSP, teachers are together with schools members to develop KTSP based on students potential and local needs (UUD No. 20 year 2003/article 37).In fact, it is of concluding importance to examine what we could learn from prior and present efforts to bring about the strategies that are currently progressed by BSNP to help every educational unit in developing its curriculum.Harianti (2008) explained although the authority of national curriculum developm ent has changed. It is not making a sense for curriculum center to lose their jobs, the task change progressively to assist schools to prepare their own respective curricula. Furthermore, she points out the job office is not seem to be easy, nowadays, there are a large number of schools in Indonesia contains 43.461 (elementary schools), 12.731 (junior high schools), 4.499 (senior high school) and 2.655 (vocational high schools), yet, not including Early Childhood education, Extraordinary Schools and Madrasah. It does not allow for curriculum center helps one by one, there should be a schema then schools can develop their own curricula (para. 2). The expectation is that they can develop a curriculum, becoming true backbone in improving local human resources through education in national or even in international competitiveness.Empowerment the schools and community in developing KTSP done through a technical assistance, both at the provincial level as well as at the level of distric t/city, at the provincial level expected to present a TPK (Curriculum Development Team) whose responsibility to provide the information and give assistances on the development of KTSP to TPK at the level district. Empowerment at the provincial level such as Riau is pure in the area of curriculum development till the teams performing evaluation and monitoring its implementation based on their own respective regions, beside at the district level is concentrated on the ability of the team to perform in school curriculum development assistance.KTSP where commonly known as school based curriculum gone to be discussed for a long, the commodious study of Marsh Collin et.al (1990) on their final finding of School based curriculum development had suggested through sub of specifics SBCD issues The key actors involved in political decisions about schooling in their respective countries tend to use several terms to describe or promote their efforts. Such term include quality of schooling, sc hool-improvement, school-focused improvement, self-managing school, and many others. Be that as it may, there are a number of interesting issues about SBCD and (its synonyms) which are currently of considerable interest and are likely to remain so in the ready future. They includeThe role of parents and students in decision makingFinancial anxiety by schoolsProfessional development for teachersTeacher appraisalSchool evaluationPressure of tightening central control(As cited in Marsh Colin, et.al, 1990, pp. 206-207)There are always the various obstacles occurred in realizing the empowerment of schools and its KTSP, at the first, lack of ability is the main construct, by creating the development of staffs capabilities while providing technical assistance to particular regions could lead them to learn by doing. The instability of funding for the dissemination and socialization of KTSP causes Curriculum Center also experienced substantial cost-cutting measures, it impacts the perfect planning that has been initially organized became severely hampered in its implementation and also make the distrusting between local to Curriculum Center. But the best spirit of area in welcoming this new curriculum to be highly efficacious drug for the Curriculum Center to do the best in accordance with the appropriate quality needs, potentials and regional particularities.As informed by Curriculum Center (2010), the monitoring noticed about the implementation of KTSP has been conducted mostly in large areas, although majority of them still adopting from existing model of curriculum. Hopefully, with technical assistances that undertaken by various parties affect to the success of its development and helping their understanding on the concept and philosophy, and then encourage them to develop based on their respective conditions.Furthermore, the Curriculum center toward its official website released about the uniqueness of KTSP implementation in term of schools needs diversities, A lthough the two junior high schools are located in the adjacent neighborhood but it was very much different pupils conditions. The A school whose current learners come from upper and middle(a) class of socio-economic with having high academic achievement, all of them want to continue on to university. On the other hand, the B school whose majorities of learners come from disadvantaged of socio-economic, plan to graduate soon and earning money is a primary goal of schooling. two of these two schools will develop a very different curriculum. School A will focus on studies with higher order intellection that enables learners to have high academic thinking in leading them to continue university. While school B will enrich the subjects with several activities that cultivate the skills to work so that learners feel a sense of great good skills after graduating from school B.There a lot of researchers have investigated about KTSP. Specifically on its implementation, based on the review ing above some researchers had focused on the effectiveness on its evaluation based on the real phenomenon which occurred in the real situation of the schools, the writer although cannot find the way of th