Feds Transition from Monetary to Interest Rate Targets Essay -- essays

feeds Transition from m unrivalledtary to absorb Rate TargetsThe Feds Transition from financial Targets to Interest Rate TargetsIntroductionThe Federal Reserve appeared to be taking on a completely different stance in 1994 versus 1993. During 1993 in that respect were no changes in the insurance indemnity directives of the Federal Open Market Committee and short interest sends remained steady. In contrast, during 1994, the FOMC announced six different policy changes while at the same time making an adjustment to the short interest rate. This change in policy was due to two factors. First, the economic environment had changed. The Feds monetary policy during 1993 was accommodative to allow for the rec everywherey of the economy from a recession, while the policy became more restrictive in 1994 as the economy appeared to be recovering and possibly heating plant up. Another cause of this apparent shift was growing consensus that price stability should be the ultimate e agle-eyed-term goal of the Federal Reserve. Also, the Fed adjusted its intermediate targeting strategy, placing more emphasis on interest rate targets over monetary aggregate targets.Monetary GoalsTo understand why the Fed changed its targets and goals the manner it did, we should first examine the process the Fed uses to determine and pursue its declared goals. There are six monetary policy goals that are in demand(p) in an efficient economy. These are 1) price stability, 2) senior high employment, 3) economic growth, 4) financial market and institution stability, 5) interest rate stability, and 6) foreign-exchange market stability. There has been in the past, and continues to be, some concern that these goals whitethorn be in conflict with one another. This concern, although valid for some circumstances, has been given more attention than it warrants. In particular, there has been an historic belief that there is a trade-off between ostentation and unemployment. Low infla tion was expected to come at the cost of high unemployment and vice versa. The experiences of the 1970s in the United States showed us that this is not of necessity true, as we experienced periods of simultaneously high inflation and high unemployment. The tradeoff that we expect is actually a short-term one, and as Alan Greenspan noted, in the long run lower levels of inflation are conducive to the achievement of greater productivity and efficiency and, therefore,... ... 5 goals. Second, an increasing use of interest rate targets meant that they were using targets that were more indicative of the effectiveness of its policy tools and the contain for pass on action. Continuing to track monetary aggregates may not have revealed the need to take action. Third, the economy had been heating up and some action to unwind the growth was simply needed at this time.The change in the Feds policy actions from 1993 to 1994 is not as drastic as it may first appear. It is merely a continui ng evolution of the manner in which the Fed executes the strategy and tactics of its monetary policy. The effectiveness of this modification of its policy is borne out by the lack of any visible sign of inflation at the end of 1994. Additional time will provide the requirement information to determine if this policy stance is still effective in the future and adjustments will undoubtedly have to be made.BibliographyReferencesThe FOMC in 1993 and 1994 Monetary Policy in Transition.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March,1995Flying Swine detach Targets and Goals of Monetary PolicyJournal of Economic Issues, June, 1996